-
+3
.Lest we forget 1
— Shaun Rickard (@ShaunRickard67) December 9, 2023
We have taken names, I suggest you all do the same.
We will never let these virtue signaling scum bags and gaslighters simply disappear into obscurity.
Each and every one of these vile fascistic parasites will be held to account one day. pic.twitter.com/uTY0yAokUC
. -
.
. -
+2 .
. -
+2 .
in a live media interview #CharlesManson addressed “the good guys” by saying the following:
— The Rubber Duck ™ (@TheRubberDuck79) December 11, 2023
“And when you’re drinking your children’s blood, I see you.”
“You can’t fake on me.”
“Because I was your children. I was your children of the 40s.”
“#EleanorRoosevelt can’t fake on… pic.twitter.com/iCWCIMYvPi. -
.
Anyone believe a word of this or think she is spreading fear for her ds handlers in a young package. nancy pelosi 2.0.
https://files.catbox.moe/s2uhhr.mp4. -
.
Of course. . -
.
How deep does it run?
https://alphanews.org/elk-river-board-cens...-board-members/
Elk River board censures pro-parent school board members
Some think the board is setting the stage to remove them.
By Sheila Qualls -December 15, 2023
A standing-room only crowd listened as school board attorney Michael Waldspurger read the allegations against newly elected board members John Anderson and Mindy Freiberg. (Courtesy photos)
Two Elk River school board members who were elected on a pro-parent platform say they are being intimidated by their colleagues after the board voted to censure them for misconduct Monday night.
A standing-room only crowd listened as school board attorney Michael Waldspurger read the allegations against newly elected board members John Anderson and Mindy Freiberg before presenting a censure resolution, which the board voted on and approved. Anderson and Freiberg were elected to the ISD 728 board in 2022.
“They want us off the board, but they aren’t going to get rid of me that easy,” Freiberg said.
Allegations of misconduct included being late or unprepared for meetings, speaking to legislators or constituents without authority, inquiring about curriculum, and failing to communicate with Superintendent Dan Bittman, the board’s employee, in a timely manner.
In addition, Anderson was accused of making inappropriate comments in the workplace, interfering with the work of the superintendent, and disparaging the superintendent to community members, whom Waldspurger failed to identify.
Although the community members were not identified, Waldspurger said investigators had no reason to believe their stories were “fabricated.”
After presenting the findings, Waldspurger presented the board with four options: do nothing, issue a verbal warning, censure, which is a written warning, or removal. He prepared the censure resolution in advance.
Superintendent Dan Bittman/ISD 728
Anderson and Freiberg said they have done nothing outside of the scope of their duties as board members.
“If I asked questions during the board meeting, they said I was unprepared,” Freiberg said. “It’s my job as a board member to ask questions. I ask questions during the meeting so the public hears, but the other board members would get annoyed. Without questions, you never get real discussion on policies.”
Both Anderson and Freiberg said they have been intimidated by the superintendent and board members since they assumed their posts and were unaware of the specific findings against them until Monday’s school board meeting, leaving them unable to prepare a defense.
“Mindy took out a 12-year school board veteran, business owner by a pretty big margin,” Anderson said. “He’s (the superintendent) been after us from day one. I’m realizing that he keeps a list of every transgression.”
Bittman said none of the members were aware of the findings or had a copy of the report prior to Monday’s meeting, which was a decision made by the board’s attorney.
“The Board members were aware of the allegations, participated in the investigation with independent counsel, had met with both the Superintendent and Board Chair about the concerns on numerous occasions, and had been provided specific training and counsel from the School Board’s attorney related to the violations,” Bittman said in an emailed comment.
According to Bittman, the censure resolution “puts individuals on notice that continued violations could result in additional action taken by the School Board.”
“It is our hope that the Board can return to a focus on the District’s core mission and values: doing what is best for our students. This is a goal we all share in our community,” he said.
‘You better get in line’
The message is very clear, according to Minnesota Rep. Walter Hudson, R-Albertville. Members who don’t fall in line may find themselves on the “wrong side of aggressive action,” he said.
“This was the first step in removing these members from the board. There is a disconnect between the political will of these communities and the school districts that are supposed to serve them,” Hudson said. “This is a huge story. This deserves national attention.”
The school board, as a self-policing organization, and under Minnesota statutes, can remove members from the board and then fill the vacancy. The board chair has special powers to open investigations and initiate a vote for removal. There is no appeals process.
“From the moment they got on the board as conservative members, they’ve had an antagonistic relationship with the five other school board members, the superintendent, and staff in the school district,” Hudson said. “It all came to a head at Monday’s meeting.”
The board voted 5-2 at Monday night’s meeting to censure the board members. (ISD 728/YouTube)
Board Chair Holly Thompson ordered an investigation into alleged violations of protocol, procedure, and policy in August. Hudson said the threat of removal at Monday’s meeting was thinly veiled.
“You better not talk to staff. You better not talk to your own constituents. You better not ask questions after noon on a Friday. You better not rock the boat. You better not vote no without telling somebody first,” he said. “You better get in line. You better start deferring and telling us how awesome we are. You’d better start doing that or you’re going to be off this body.”
According to Hudson, self-government implies that a community’s values should be reflected in how policy is set and implemented. Hudson said the community votes 65-35 conservative but has a school board that votes for progressive policies.
“Our community is very deep red, yet you go to the school districts or school board meetings and it sounds like you’re listening to dissertations from Berkeley,” he said. “The reason for that is because the teachers union is an unofficial outgrowth of the Democratic Party. It has a virtual monopoly on the electoral workings that result in who is on the school board. They organize and box out any potential opposition.”
Waldspurger frequently referenced district policy 209, which outlines the requirements of how school board members are to conduct themselves. Bittman said the board’s “independent counsel” confirmed the violations of the policy, which in many cases were “acknowledged by the individuals in question.”
But Hudson believes the censure resolution was an exercise in “character assassination” and an abuse of the district’s policy.
“It was very clear in the way that they presented it that their idea of preparation for meetings means that you have no questions. If you’re prepared, that means you understand what’s going to happen and you approve of it,” Hudson said. “If you don’t approve or if you’re going to vote against something, you will have a problem. That’s indicative of the fact that you weren’t prepared to deal with it. Any questions you have should have been asked prior to the meeting and should have been resolved between you and the superintendent before the meeting. So if you’re questioning or antagonistic or critical of any policy or curriculum or anything that’s taking place in the district, that’s an indication that you weren’t prepared to come to the meeting.”
District leaders are hiding behind policy 209 to shield themselves from criticism, according to Hudson.
“They have abused the policy in order to insulate the school staff and the superintendent from any meaningful scrutiny of how policy is being implemented,” he said. “If you don’t trust what you’re being told by the superintendent, you can’t go over his head or around him and actually engage directly with staff and ask them any questions. You have to just trust that what the superintendent is telling you is true and accurate and complete. Because they refuse to do that, both Mindy and John — because they’re actually interested in digging into the details and understanding the on-the-ground reality of what’s happening in the school district — that’s considered a violation of protocol and policy.”
After Waldspurger read the allegations, Anderson and Freiberg were allowed to comment before the vote. Anderson called the investigation a “sham.”
“This interview, the interrogation was just kind of looking for a crime, looking for something. I just think it’s terrible what’s going on here. I have no shame for what I’ve done,” Anderson said.
Freiberg agreed, saying the district “threw stuff at a wall to see if anything would stick.”
“As a school board member, I did things like asked questions at school board meetings, held public meetings for constituents to express their opinions and concerns, asked for curriculum information — that is school board work,” she said. “It’s a sad day when our valuable tax dollars are wasted in an attempt to find something wrong. I work for the people. This is a sham of an investigation. And this won’t stop me from talking to people. It didn’t work. I am focused on bettering the lives of our students, teachers, and faculty, and I will continue advocating for parental involvement, academics, and freedom in ISD 728.”
. -
.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/r...-2024-election/
‘Zuckbucks’ Group is Planning to Meddle in the 2024 Election
By Mike LaChance Jan. 19, 2024 10:20 pm181 Comments
TruthTweetShareGettrGabTelegram
As you may recall, during the 2020 election, left wing groups used millions in ‘Zuckbucks’ to take control of local polling offices. Everyone concedes that this made a difference in the election, including people on the left. They admitted it in a Time Magazine article about how they ‘fortified’ the 2020 election.
Even though many states have taken steps to address this issue in order to keep these folks away from the 2024 election, they are now trying to do it again by going at it on the federal level by working with FEMA.
These people have access to tons of data and demographics. If they are allowed to do so, they will target the cities and states they believe they will need in order to ensure a Democrat victory.
The Federalist is sounding the alarm about this:
Skyrocketing Food Prices Are Prompting Many Americans to Stock Up on Long-Term Storage Beef
Infamous ‘Zuckbucks’ Group Tries To Election-Meddle Again — This Time With Federal Tax Dollars
On Wednesday, in an email sent to a network of election officials and nonprofit organizations, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) announced it would begin efforts to facilitate applications to a massive federal government grant program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This program could potentially funnel more than $700 million to election offices during the 2024 election under the auspices of CTCL officials and their partners in the nonprofit world of left-wing election activism. CTCL is the organization that funneled hundreds of millions of Mark Zuckerberg’s dollars into key election offices to increase Democrat turnout in the 2020 election.
CTCL announced in “ELECTricity,” its regular e-newsletter sent to thousands of election officials who are part of its network, that it will host a webinar on Jan. 25 to assist those officials in applying for FEMA’s 2024 Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant program.
Nevertheless, CTCL asserts in its email invitation that it will assist election offices in applying for BRIC grants. According to its creative interpretation of the new Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, elections should be classified as a “critical service” deserving of competitive FEMA grant funding. According to the email, “As a core element of government function, elections are a critical service and eligible for this government funding.” The webinar plans to cover the application process, and “will include sample content, as well as inspiration for what the grant funds can be used for.”
State leaders need to be aware of this and must put a stop to it.Democrats use taxpayer funds to promote the election of Democrats. Yes, the efforts to turn us into a one party nation are evil. The bureaucracy is the enemy.
— Gary Doyle (@GetInTheGame18) January 19, 2024
Infamous ‘Zuckbucks’ Group Tries To Election-Meddle Again, This Time With Federal Tax Dollars https://t.co/Skm03cIl9D
The left is doing this again because they know it worked last time and they will keep doing it until it is stopped.. -
+1 .
And here we are. https://t.co/SoP2FfPXOZ
— Fred Simon (@FredSimonTLM) March 31, 2024.
EVIL ! |
